The intervention detailed its implementation in terms of time, resources, training, and partnerships. These were discussed as: Time: The project ran from April 2014 to June 2017 Resources: (Funding & Staff): The total IWT grant value was £215,932. Additional funds were secured from various sources during and after the project lifetime, including the Turtle Conservation Fund, Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund, Jean Sainsbury, and an Online Appeal. Staff included a project manager, patrol coordinator, project leader, and various coordinators and field workers from partner institutions. Laptops, GPS units for patrollers, and tents for patrollers were purchased as capital items. Training: Customs Officials: Over 300 Customs staff received CITES training provided by UK Border Force and MEEF. This included multiple training workshops-National Park Staff/Patrollers: 44 people (21 NGO staff and 23 community patrollers) were trained in the use of SMART anti-poaching software, and this training was provided by one of the project partners, specifically Wildlife Conservation Society. Judiciary: Initial workshops were held for police, prosecutors, and magistrates, with a two-day training attended by 58 national and regional judiciary representatives in the first year of the implementation of the project. Customs Officials: Over 300 staff were involved in multiple training workshops Partnerships: The project involved a collaborative group of institutions, including Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust (contract holder), Madagascar National Parks (MNP), TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Alliance Voahary Gasy (AVG), Madagasikara Voakajy (MaVoa), Turtle Conservancy, UK Border Force, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), and the Government of Madagascar. This was the first time these partners had worked together as a collaborative group The case study also recorded several challenges that hindered its implementation. These included: Dramatic escalation in poaching pressure: The project had no forewarning of the ""almost complete removal of the ploughshare tortoise from three of the five sub-populations"". Nevertheless, it responded by adapting strategies, dramatically increasing security within the Beaboaly area, increasing patrol hours, moving patrols to critical areas, and implementing ""brigades mixtes"" (armed patrols). Low capacity and unwillingness of judiciary/law enforcement to engage and prosecute: Magistrates were initially ""unwilling to engage"" and gave ""insignificant sanctions,"" and corruption was a major barrier. This was overcome by working with a ""virtuous circle of magistrates"" known to be honest and interested, focusing efforts on specific trials, and ensuring due process was followed, which led to successful prosecutions and significant sentences. Difficulties with SMART implementation and data management: The transition from paper-based to SMART was ""much more complex than originally anticipated"", and capacity needs were underestimated. To address this, the project recruited an additional manager for Beaboaly, and a Data Manager in Antananarivo to help in the transition to SMART. Political instability and weak governance: The project was conceived during a period of political crisis, and instability continued, affecting government capacity and hindering relationships with authorities, such as the Customs. The project mediated this by meetings with ministries and authorities (e.g., Ministry of Transport for Customs training) to proceed with activities despite changes.